Home » Did Murkomen Call Mukurwe-ini MP Kaguchia a “Gaidi” and Say His Arrest Was Meant to Serve as a Lesson to the Opposition?

Did Murkomen Call Mukurwe-ini MP Kaguchia a “Gaidi” and Say His Arrest Was Meant to Serve as a Lesson to the Opposition?

By Faith Lagat 

A Facebook post by Kenya News Flash claims that Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen referred to Mukurwe-ini MP John Philip Gichohi Kaguchia as a “gaidi” (terrorist) whose arrest was intended as a lesson to the “confused opposition,” while also dismissing the constituency’s electoral weight and warning against demonstrations there.

The post states: “Mukurwe Ini hata hamuna kura! Kii gaidi inaitwa Kaguchia tumekamata ndio iwe funzo kwa wengine kama yeye hapo confused opposition wasiwahi ongea vibaya. Mtu asijaribu kuandamana hapo Mukurwe Ini. Kipchumba Murkomen.”

Kenya News Flash is a social media page that posts political commentary and news snippets, often in a sensational style. The post circulated widely among users reacting to Kaguchia’s arrest, amplifying narratives of government high-handedness.

Kenya News Flash post of Facebook

Background

The claim is rooted in the dramatic arrest of Mukurwe-ini MP John Kaguchia on Monday, August 3, 2026. Kaguchia, a first-term legislator elected in 2022 and a vocal ally of Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP) leader and former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, had become increasingly critical of the Kenya Kwanza administration.

On Saturday, August 1, 2026, Kaguchia addressed a political gathering at Naromoru Shopping Centre in Kieni East, Nyeri County. Speaking in Kikuyu, he allegedly warned residents that those who voted for or supported President William Ruto (whom he and allies often refer to as “Kasongo”) would face social ostracism, being denied visits during bereavement, having their dowry ceremonies boycotted, and, if ill, being told to seek treatment in Sugoi (Ruto’s rural home).

He also reportedly spoke of supporters being “looked for even under their beds” or “smoked out.” Government-aligned voices described these remarks as divisive, ethnic, and capable of breaching the peace.

The following evening, Sunday, August 2, Kaguchia appeared on Inooro TV’s Kiririmbi programme. He claimed that heavily armed, hooded officers in multiple unmarked vehicles (including Subarus) had surrounded Royal Media Services (RMS) studios in Kilimani, Nairobi, and erected roadblocks with the intention of arresting him.

He refused to leave, spending the night inside the media house while updating social media and insisting he would not be intimidated. He argued that any probe into his remarks should have been handled by the National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC) rather than the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI).

On Monday morning, August 3, Regional DCI Commander Daniel Kandie led officers who arrested Kaguchia as he left the premises. He was taken first for questioning and later held at Kamukunji Police Station.

A Kiambu High Court later ordered his release on a KSh 100,000 cash bail pending further applications. On Tuesday, August 4, he appeared at Milimani Law Courts charged with offensive conduct conducive to a breach of the peace contrary to Section 94(1) of the Penal Code.

His lawyers raised preliminary objections on jurisdiction (arguing the alleged offence occurred in Nyeri and should be tried there), the framing of the charge sheet, and the manner of arrest.

Senior Principal Magistrate Teresiah Nyangena released him on a KSh 1 million bond or alternative cash bail of KSh 250,000. The court is scheduled to rule on the objections on August 19, 2026.

The arrest triggered immediate political reactions. DCP leader Rigathi Gachagua condemned it as an attempt to use the criminal justice system to settle political scores. Nyandarua Senator John Methu and other allies protested outside police stations, accusing authorities of defying court orders. Protests also erupted in Mukurwe-ini demanding his release.

On the government side, Public Service Cabinet Secretary Geoffrey Ruku defended the arrest, stating Kaguchia’s remarks “absolutely should have warranted” police action and contrasting them with other politicians’ statements.

Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah strongly rebuked Kaguchia at a State House event, calling the remarks the work of a “shetani wa ukabila” (devil of tribalism) who must be defeated and warning leaders against defending those whose words endanger national cohesion.

Kaguchia himself later accused President Ruto and CS Murkomen of directing security agencies to intimidate critics. 

The episode fits into broader 2026 tensions ahead of the 2027 General Election: rising ethnic rhetoric in Mt Kenya politics, mutual accusations of goonism and selective justice, and debates over the boundaries between free political speech and speech that risks public disorder.

Murkomen, as Interior CS, has previously clashed with Gachagua over issues of violence, gangs, and regional politics, but that history does not automatically authenticate every attributed statement.

Verification

Piga Firimbi reviewed:

  • The original Kenya News Flash Facebook post and its engagement.
  • Official statements and media interviews by Public Service CS Geoffrey Ruku and National Assembly Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah.
  • Court records and reporting on Kaguchia’s arrest, charges, bail, and preliminary objections from multiple mainstream outlets.
  • Available public statements, social media posts, and news coverage attributed to Interior CS Kipchumba Murkomen around the period of the arrest (August 1–5, 2026).
  • Searches for the exact phrases “gaidi inaitwa Kaguchia,” “tumekamata ndio iwe funzo,” “Mukurwe Ini hata hamuna kura,” and similar wording linked to Murkomen.

No credible video, audio, official statement, press conference, X/Twitter post, or mainstream media report shows Murkomen using the words attributed to him.

Searches for Murkomen linking Kaguchia to “gaidi,” describing the arrest as a “funzo” (lesson) for the opposition, dismissing Mukurwe-ini’s votes, or warning against demonstrations there returned no matching results from verified sources.

Murkomen’s verified X account (@kipmurkomen) contains no posts that match the claim within the relevant timeframe.

While Kaguchia and his allies have accused Murkomen of overseeing or directing the operation, these remain political allegations without the specific inflammatory language cited in the Facebook post.

The public defences of the arrest came from CS Ruku (who explicitly said the remarks warranted arrest) and Ichung’wah (who focused on the dangers of ethnic politics).

The legal process has proceeded through the DPP and the courts under the Penal Code charge of offensive conduct, not under any terrorism-related provisions that the word “gaidi” might imply.

The Facebook post presents the quote without video, audio, date, location, or context of when and where Murkomen supposedly said it. In the absence of primary evidence, the attribution appears fabricated or satirical commentary designed to frame the arrest in the strongest possible terms.

Verdict

The claim that Interior CS Kipchumba Murkomen called Mukurwe-ini MP John Kaguchia a “gaidi” and stated that his arrest was meant to serve as a lesson to the opposition is FALSE.

Add comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *